
It shouldn’t be difficult, should it, to give myself six extra posts with which to cover a two week holiday I need to write just one extra post a week for six weeks, easy, right? I very regularly over-produce. Ultimately what I write about is a life in which minor incident becomes major preoccupation (the A-Z of Colin’s existence in thrice weekly splotches) but even this life should have sufficient bumps in the road to inspire some additional blatherskite: an extra 500 words-worth per week should not be beyond me.
Perhaps I have become hyper-attuned to the routine. Maybe that’s the problem. Something appears to switch off after the third rattle of the box each week. I cease to look for things that pique my curiosity, I no longer feel the urge to try to explain what I do not understand, I can get along just fine without needing to know who put the pea under my mattress. Staring through the windows becomes a fruitless pursuit, a walk around the village becomes nothing more than the smack of icy rain in the face and the embarrassment of not recognising the next-door-neighbour in the queue at the Co-op, a trip to the doctor’s becomes just bad news. (It is an immutable law of nature that once you have passed the age of sixty, all trips to the doctors are precursors of bad news.)
I remember Jasper Carrott once saying that he began to find writing his stand-up routines ever more difficult because strange things stopped happening to him and he found that trying to make them happen never worked. My problem – if I may say so – is a knottier one: I do not rely on strange things happening, I rely on anything happening. The mundane may not be much, but at least it is a point of departure.
I am in the midst of a period of vaccination renewal, annual health and medication checks and, of course, the inevitable ‘make an appointment with the doctor who wishes to review your results’ letters. In my experience, the doctor has never wished to see me in order to offer congratulations on the robustness of my constitution. There are a million possibilities, none of them good. The letters say “THIS IS A NON URGENT APPOINTMENT” which is clearly meant to reassure me, but which, in fact, merely serves to open up a can of worms. I have a review with the pharmacist tomorrow, so it is obviously something that he/she is not able to discuss. Why? I do not know and no-one can, or will, tell me. Professional Protocol: the doctor gets to do the big stuff? Maybe the doctor just needs to keep their hand in. Perhaps they have a speciality and my peculiar symptoms (of which I am blithely unaware) flag me up as a suitable case for investigation. Whatever, I will find out in due course because THIS IS A NON URGENT APPOINTMENT and I will be spoken to sometime when the doctor has ‘a window’. I hope blood pressure is not the issue, because it is currently going through the roof, as the final possibility has just occurred to me. What if NON URGENT does not mean ‘trivial’, what if it does not mean ‘non life threatening’, what if it actually means ‘too late to do anything about it. No rush. If you can’t get an appointment in the next six weeks, between you and me, I probably wouldn’t bother.’?
And all while I’m trying to find something extra to say each week…
Doctor can you help me please
I’m laying on the floor
I need a glass of something
Like you gave me once before… Doctor – Wishbone Ash








