
In common with all other normal, rational people, I cannot cope with a badly stacked dishwasher: the opening of a door on such an appliance is like throwing wide the gates of hell. There can be no devil more impudent than the stray cup dropped into the rack reserved for plates. The ‘rules’ are very simple: dump anything in haste, anywhere it might conceivably fit, and disaster awaits. At least half of the pots will have to go through again; glasses do not get clean below plates and bowls; pans do not get clean when they contain a bowl or a sieve; cups do not get clean when they turn over. (Tea cups, in fact, do not get clean at all these days. They are clearly putting something in it down the wossname, factory.) Two minutes, that is all it takes, two minutes: put dirty things in the right place, neat and tidy, and magically they come out clean an hour or so later. Simple.
Now, I know what you are thinking, and you are wrong. I am not at all anal: this is pure common sense. I do not generally feel the need to preach it. Outside of the occasional heavy sigh, you would never know that I was having to re-pack the bloody thing – again. And if you think that this is an analogy of my life, well it could be, except in life I am the one who insists on putting everything in the wrong place; the one who really should take a minute or two to consider what I am doing before I cock everything up. If you want a kitchen analogy of my life you’d probably be better to consider me as a dysfunctional Kenwood Chef. I am a terrible mixer. I find smalltalk excruciatingly difficult. I make ill-advised jokes or – in an attempt to not completely shame myself – remain stoically silent. When it comes to mixing with new people I am, in the professional jargon of the psychoanalyst, a complete waste of time and space.
I have just completed my first ever stint on jury service. (Something about which I could not write – nor indeed talk – at the time and even now, when it is all over, I feel it incumbent upon me to leave all detail in the courthouse, although I think I am free to talk about it in general terms.) It is fair to say that just over two weeks ago I was dreading the prospect. I do not feel that I am in any way equipped to pass judgement on other people. I am also totally unused to being thrust into a roomful of people I do not know.
I sat sullenly silent with fifty other souls in fevered anticipation of what horror awaited me. What actually happens is that you are split into ‘juries’ and sent your separate ways. You are immediately a band of brothers (actually, in this case, ‘sisters’ by majority vote) and you become closer than you would ever feel possible in such a short space of time. After two weeks you part, feeling that you have missed the opportunity of life-long friendship with people you almost certainly will never meet again. There is so much ‘hanging around’, spent chatting and joking, fretting and sitting in companionable silence – and I now realise that I can do that. It comes as a complete surprise to me. I am able to chat! In extremis I am able to be me without pretending to be somebody else. I enjoyed the company of everyone there and thank them all (although they will never know it) for fitting me in.
I realise that I do not fit in with the intellectual elite, but at the same time, I do not always fit in with the stupid either. My position within the circle of the inept is unassailable – and we can turn up just about anywhere. I am always amazed by the capacity of others to put up with me and, I now discover, my own to fit in with them when I have to. I do not know what we might have done for the defendant (well, I do actually, but even now I’m not certain I can say) but I know what the jury did for me. Sometimes everything just stacks up nicely…






