
The moment having long gone when I may have tried to do anything about it, I feel that the time is now ripe for a terminal whine about the real reason behind our upcoming move to more ‘two old people-sized’ living quarters. It is not our current house that is getting us down, but the proximity of those that are sprouting up around it. People need places to live – I get that – even when the houses that are being built are in no way affordable by those who need them. This is a tiny island with an awful lot of people on it (and, sadly, a lot of awful people). This is not a blast about the blight on our ever-diminishing green sward, nor the impact on those who live just inches – literally – from the ringworm spread of ‘progress’, this is a whinge about the system that allows it to happen, even when it knows it really should not.
The houses behind us now loom, towering over us raised, as they are, to ‘prevent flooding’ – but more on that later…

The news of the planning application – many years ago now – was greeted with the usual howls of dismay by our little villageful of NIMBY’s. What is wrong with doubling the village’s size in one fell swoop? What difference could a mere 350 houses make to an already sagging village infrastructure? We would find out at the planning meeting. We did. Initially the meeting heard from the village Flood Prevention Officer who gave evidence that the scale of development would be a disaster for the already stressed drainage system. (A problem with which I closely identify, should I drink more than two pre-lunch coffees.) It then heard from representatives of the health centre, the schools and the shops, all of whom attested that they would not be able to cope without serious investment and expansion. It then heard from the builders who said they had a responsibility to ensure that their new properties would not flood. They intended to achieve this by building the houses on higher ground than those surrounding them. “Won’t that just cause flooding in the neighbouring properties?” they were asked. “Not our responsibility,” they said. They were asked about the potential problems caused by up to 700 new children being crammed into local schools, over a thousand souls crushed into the care of a teetering health centre, possibly 700 new cars leaving the village for the city every morning on crumbling country roads. “Not our responsibility,” they said. So whose responsibility could it be? Surely the man from the council would be able to inform us. He stood, he spoke and this (paraphrased to the very best of my memory) is what he said.
“You can object to the building,” he said, “but you will be wasting your time. This development will go ahead. The government wants us to build 350 houses in this area and by putting them all here, we won’t have to worry about anywhere else. (‘Including’ – he did not say – ‘where I live.’) The alternative ‘brown-field’ sites in the city? They will take so much cleaning up. It’s much better if we just leave them derelict. Farm land is so much easier. The despoliation of your outlook and your way of life, by the way, is not a valid complaint – so don’t bother with that one. We don’t have the money to improve the village amenities, but it doesn’t really matter because it is not our responsibility either. As for flooding, we agree that it is likely to occur, but it will be at the lower end of the village where the drainage is already overloaded, so we can’t possibly be blamed for that, can we? Besides, if you don’t like it, you could always try to sell your poor, devalued houses and move out. I don’t care: I live in one of the places that is now going to escape development. Thank you for coming – it is always important to gauge local opinion – but you’ve totally wasted your time. Goodbye…” And so, somewhat bewildered, we wandered out of the village hall, dazed and confused by the blinding inevitability of a fait that was very much accompli.
…And that brings us to where we are today, backing on to two giant, raised, five-bedroom houses that are certainly going to be the answer to the housing crisis – just the thing to help people clamber onto the housing ladder – at the fringes of a giant housing estate that develops in fits and starts whilst they wait for non-existent buyers to come forward waving wads of cash. Democracy in action. It has finally ground us down. We are moving to a bungalow that is already surrounded on all sides, happy that there should be no potential for a behemoth to appear inches from our back fence – until, of course, they tell us that next door’s forty-eight storey HMO extension no longer needs planning permission and, “even if it did, don’t be a NIMBY, it is for the greater good and, best of all, it’s nowhere near my back yard…”

Dazed and Confused – Led Zeppelin (Jimmy Page) has no relevance whatsoever, other than its title…
NIMBY is an abusive acronym (Not In My Back Yard) aimed at those who strive to stop ill-advised developments by those who ensure that it is nowhere near their own, probably extensive, back gardens…
HMO (House of Multiple Occupancy) – a means of squeezing thirty-eight homeless souls into a three bedroom town house with a single bathroom and a kitchen within which it would prove impossible to swing a rat whilst becoming very rich on multiple rents and buying a house with the kind of back garden for which you would need a telescope to see whatever anyone might manage to build at the back of it…






